They protested the non-freedom of the press ... and against whom the complaint our beloved anti-fascist press:
Antonio Di Pietro, one of the first to support the event. A true record man of action with over 300 cases (357 seconds Republic) against the press and well-received 700 thousand euro. With all due respect the right of his critics. There state, but has formally joined, the former prime minister Massimo D'Alema. All remember him for the maxi-claim 3 billion lira against the poor Forattini for a cartoon in the Republic on the list Mitrokhin, later withdrawn, but said that dismissing the Forattini was a founder of the Republic .... but he withdrew another $ 2 billion to the carrier who had dared to criticize him about his union strategy. The claim by € 500 thousand for the printing an article that quoted in reference to a dossier investigative agency Kroll. And in 2002 sued the Republic for an interview with Maurizio Gasparri who called her 'open-mindedness "for his passion for sailing.
Rosi Bindi when he was health minister sued Giovanni Sartori, a columnist for the Courier. Oliviero Diliberto, secretary of the PDCI, which sued for free publication of a report of the Central Committee in 2006, shouting: "We have already funded the campaign for policies with € 100 thousand." He went on asking for one million to a spokesman for the Jewish community in Milan for an interview with the Republic in which stigmatized their anti-Israeli positions.
De Benedetti thought it was then expressed as follows: "It is clear that in Italy there is freedom of the press, but there is a problem of restriction of freedom of information and opportunities by the citizen to be informed with different points of view. Episodes such as the directors who have even had to resign because they were attacked shows that the freedom with which the individual journalist can do its job in a calm and detached way restricted. "
Press freedom is part time as that girl who claimed to be a bit 'pregnant ... 
Roberto Saviano deserves the Oscar for idiocy. The author of Gomorrah, exactly one week from the interview to the ice age of television Bignardi, said that "freedom of the press in Italy is" and spoke of "serenity of the press," He to press foreign painting democracy in Italy with comparisons such as defeatists with the Cali cartel in Colombia, where drug smuggler Orejuela explained: "You're allied with someone unless blackmail." Refined parallelism with the elusive blackmail Berlusconi to the press. Nothing to say, a nice service to Italy, (but you know, he's jew), especially in the versions published in El Pais, Le Figaro, Die Zeit and The Times. But on the website of British newspaper, where a "cheatsheet" of his article was published in the section, "columnist," the writer has been heavily criticized by readers. The more acid comment? "This article is pure idiocy." Pure idiocy.
What annoys the readers of the Times (some of which our countrymen) is that article shows a vision of the Italians as "stupid." Juma writes: "People are perfectly capable of forming an opinion and free elections will tell whether or not appreciate Berlusconi. Instead no one has voted Gordon Brown ...».
Yeah, in England, the prime minister - recently sanctified by journalists to have answered those who asked on behalf of its use of antidepressants - have not voted, but he became tenant of Downing Street only by virtue of the resignation of Tony Blair. That is, answers on antidepressant pills, but is not elected Prime Minister for appointment. It is the democracy answers.
And all these Protestants to forget that 6,745 criminal and civil cases brought to the press since 1994, the requests of representatives of the Centre amounted to 312 million out of a total of 486 million euro. The center-right
beats for 312 to 174! And since
protesting the fascist censors, someone should explain who was instead to impose a strict censorship on all matters relating to political events of the European Union, important events for us all. We must recognize that this suspicious silence, and even provokes a sense of anxiety because you can not find an explanation. First of all because you stick the sources of information of any political party. Who ordered not to talk about it, is therefore on the parties? And why should not he speak?
The Italian government has already ratified, without allowing even the smallest question, based on the most anti-democratic rule of our Constitution, one that escapes the will of the citizens 'foreign policy', although, in fact, transformed the European Constitution in the Treaty, as foreign policy is in itself a beautiful
scam. We should add that one wonders why the silence opposition ahead of a measure of the Berlusconi government, given the usual noisy dissent to any decision. What said Santoro, a former MEP for this silence? We have a right to know, want to know, who has obliged him not to talk about it. Who has imposed on him and all the other drivers of televised debates, and why. Now, after promises of gifts even Ireland has capitulated, but the Treaty is not in a position to become active because they have yet to have ratified the Czech Republic, Poland and an autonomous region of Finland, the Aland archipelago .. In Prague, the opponents have tried in every way to prevent the implementation of the Treaty, including submitting to the Constitutional Court. But the constitutional courts of several countries which have appealed in recent years, many opponents of the euro and unification of Europe (above all the Germans), they never accepted the exceptions presented: the European Union is a Moloch, designed and built by powerful outside of any existing rule of law, and no one dares to put doubt, even before the legality, the logic that supports it.
Faced with such a complex situation one can not but wonder why a treaty is so important in the eyes of the rulers to make them almost crazy, it seems not at all responsible for the information. Unfortunately, the silence of good reasons as hides, along with the transfer to foreigners of most of the nation's sovereignty and independence, also rules that do not exist in the constitutions of European states and, primarily in Italian. One of these will suffice as an example: "the death sentence in case of war or danger of war, the killing of citizens to prevent the occurrence of rebellions or riots."
It is unfair that they well understand one thing: the European Union has taken measures to govern an empire that is expected from the sum of many different peoples unified at the table, the inevitable rebellion and the outbreak of serious conflict Affairs. Begins, then, so yet another tyrannical empire in Europe.
The load we put in the usual firmaioli de 'left? "... Perhaps, in the meantime
thousands have joined the call in defense of the Republic, sued by Knight of the ten questions about the Popes. A platoon joined by the irrepressible indignation Berlusca
... Well, the same wigs are now signing the petition in droves for Roman Polanski, the director stopped in Zurich to be made a party to thirteen. In '77, at the age of 44 years, Polanski - in accordance with the meticulousness of judicial documents - sodomized a minor after having stuffed with drugs to better place it to his wishes. The director admitted and settlement. But instead of serving his sentence he escaped and took French citizenship.
Now, facing down late, is a worldwide chorus of solidarity towards the old Roman who is likely to be extradited and languishing in some prison Yankees. Since we are at the forefront Placido, Tornatore, Sorrentino, Monicelli, the entire intelligentsia of the take, the usually busy, moralists and ruthless with the Cav who went to a party of eighteen and spent a night with a forty navescuola ; hippies and do-gooders with the director who did what came into his head with a 13. The contradiction is irreconcilable. Feel it as scrambling, the alleged brains. The most skillful was
Paolo Sorrentino, director of the Divine (aka Andreotti). "I signed, knowingly, both appeals - he said - but I will not comment." Smart, but at least it did not make the figure of the fool. It remains - and forever - the quintessence of impunity. For
Placido, Polanski is a "great artist" and this is enough to forgive him for rape.
The Cav is not. Therefore deserves the pillory for it is called by the lovely Naomi Papi. For
Tornatore - author of wheat Cinema Paradiso - Polanski 77 years! and a "man of his age should be spared the suffering." Berlusconi, 73, who cares, to assume its responsibility for having deflowered the whore of Bari
For the journalist of the Manifesto, that Mary Ciotti, Roman is credited with having allowed the violence to thirteen. The Cav but did not respond to the ten questions and, as she has assured us that cat breeding. The fact that Knight has sworn in all the sauces (fatal error: it was merely a laugh ..) that he has never touched a minor, to Ciotti does not care.
We see that the left have other ideas .... So, between a self-confessed junk and alleged to mandrill, the sympathy of the lady goes to the rapist must confess!
Among them all, but what it turned out the most was Mario Monicelli. Emboldened the age of almost a century, the film has opened his brain allowing the inspection. Why save Polanski and condemns the Cav? asked the Reform in an interview. "These are two people completely different, "he said ruin the lively and added:" Berlusconi has the qualities of sensitivity Polanski, not intended for men and women, in their minds, feelings, as the director. The Knight's power relationships with the company. " So what? He could have objected to this point, the reformists - who has been silent instead - the Cav will also have power but not rape. He did however its extremely sensitive Polanski do not know how to behave with men, the spirits and companionship with women, but we both know: the drugs and sodomized. Taken aback, the Methuselah would repeat what he actually said in another passage of the interview, that he wants freedom Roman because "value is an artist and I did the first film with his wife." You said a pipe! "And because Berlusconi's intention is for the noose?" I asked him instead of the reformer. "Why is Berlusconi," said the Master would finally reveal that he had little head into the centennial. Sign as they have signed, because nimble hands and dishes of the brain, but since they are the intelligentsia who pontificates in Italy, who kills them more? The EEG is flat and the sum of bad faith. How
sum is the bad faith of America that lends the money ...
With all the billions spent on bank bailouts, the U.S. Treasury has accumulated budget deficit to $ 9 trillion (9000 billion). Money that the U.S. must borrow. How? issuing bills to interest every quarter, and hoping that someone buy them for the next ten years.
Until recently, China and Japan bought a low man: in short, lend money to their maximum borrowing, why continue to buy their goods, then bought the family, and so called "primary dealers", the big U.S. banks and foreign companies.
But that was when the dollar was considered a safe currency, the reserve for international excellence. How are you today?
Foreign investors have dramatically lowered their investment 'in U.S. Treasury bills: from 159 billion dollars purchased in the first quarter fell to 101 billion in the second. A decline in the desire of dollars by 40%.
It is not enough: only foreigners buy U.S. Treasury bills in the short term (quarterly) and avoid a more distant expiration, yearly, five and ten years. Those just do not want them.
do not trust what the dollar will be worth in a year, let alone ten.
So who buy U.S. Treasury bills unsold? The Federal Reserve!.
In the second quarter, the U.S. central bank has bought 50% of the securities issued by U.S. Treasury: well over 164 billion issue of 339. A figure even more impressive because over the purchases of Treasury bills totaled made during the same period by foreigners and families (respectively 101 and 29 billion dollars).
In short, there is no demand for U.S. debt securities, especially long-term (left creaking system), and so America "lends" itself to the money they need.
The FED creates money from nothing and with that funds the Treasury. It 's a trick as old as the cuckoo, which constitutes a dealing in counterfeit currency, which creates future inflation, and to that extent, creates the conditions for hyper-inflation explosive. According
ZeroHedge, a blog well-informed, the budget for this "quantitative easing" entrusted to the Fed amounted to 300 billion dollars, and "As everyone now knows, the Fed were only 10 billion." In a few days, the government will speed up the printing of money or increasing the budget of quantitative easing, or pimp your bot increasing interest rates, with the additional burden of U.S. public debt.
according to rumors ... well informed, the Federal Reserve is planning to settle the BOT to money market funds, "because it believes that the 'primary dealers' balance sheets have not able to supply more than 100 billion dollars" to buy government debt.
Who are the primary dealers?
BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Banc of America Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Daiwa Securities America Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Jefferies & Company, Inc., JP Morgan Securities Inc., Mizuho Securities USA, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Nomura Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets Corporation, RBS Securities Inc., UBS Securities LLC.
need to be afraid! The Fed is concerned that with all these huge banks 'well capitalized' (the Fed itself), have 100 billion of capital to invest in a relatively risk-free investment as the purchase of U.S. Treasury bills shortly. Banks, in these times, have reduced commercial lending and speculating in commodities and stock markets with the money the Fed interest-free.
means that the banks are in big trouble yet, despite all the titanic injections of public money, which will be borne by the taxpayer? Apparently yes.
The Fed wants to go into money market funds because there the money is there: these funds manage 2.3 trillion dollars, so that the Fed can hope to sbolognare them 300 billion to 400 billion of Treasury bills.
But what are these funds?
are the pension funds that manage private pension (401k) and IRA, Individual Retirement Account. So, Bernanke is preparing to loot the savings for old age Americans, a people where unemployed (officially 14.5 million) are six times more than the jobs offered. And where 12% of asking 'food stamps', which means good food poverty line.
Conclusion: the enormity of the debt and money ex-nihilo issued by the U.S. State is liable to ruin families, threatening the solvency of financial institutions and enterprises, it is likely vaporize the dollar as currency, and finally, shake the stability of the entire global economy. How? The
said Andrew Sheng, member of the Chinese banking regulator, speaking at the conference "The International Financial Crisis "organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago ..." the change the problem of bank insolvency in a matter of sovereign default will not improve things, indeed replicate "the Japanese lost decade" on a global scale. "
He added, no nation is able to raise their interest rates because the flood of money created from nothing in the U.S. are ready to swoop in mass in the nation that he did, creating explosive bubbles. Sheng said the "Carry Trade" is the most idiotic speculations made possible by globalization is to borrow money interest-free in one country and work in another country, where the BOT makes local more. For the ten years prior to 2007, speculators typically borrow money in yen because Japan's central bank kept rates at zero, hoping to spark economic recovery, and they "invested" in any other place. Even in Hungary, offering loans at rates greater than zero, however.
absurdly overheated economy, China is in the midst of depression that affects the world and its major customers. Would need to raise interest rates to cool its economy, but can not do so because they would attract more capital from the USA, hot capital, created from nothing. Already suffering from serious overcapacity problems, offer credit to play the stock market (and the Chinese stock market has grown 85% a year), offer loans to those who buy real estate and commodities, leading to astronomical increases in those areas.
The entire Chinese manufacturing facility is in danger of collapse when the bubble burst ... and as always, the disaster is due to the speculative global finance, the famous "free movement of capital". The monster "communist" wanted to bind to double strand to the monster of capitalism, the successful G-2 in straparlano our economists and politicians are only two titans that fall into the abyss together. We would be delighted if it were not that drags with other economies.
Beijing is chained to his treasure, $ 2 trillion in U.S. securities. Can not sell them without harm to the dollar, causing the rise of the renminbi (his money) and thus losing the 'competitiveness', and dealt a further blow to its exports already tragically fallen. So alarmed Beijing assists in the loss of value of the dollar, and consequently of its treasure than 2 trillion.
In normal times, copper is an invaluable indicator of the situation: when prices rise, it means that we are in an economic boom. But in recent months, the indicator is broken: copper prices rise, but the economy is in deep depression. All of the increase is due to the hoarding of China.
continue to lay it on thick, but until when? It all depends on whether there will be a recovery in the short to medium term. That seems unlikely to say the least.
fact. As they spend all the money of the 'rescue', aspiring unemployment benefits, which expire in the "stimulus" in support of certain industries and not others, the social crisis will be revealed in all its harshness. Take the scrapping premiums for the purchase of new cars: sales have increased in Italy and Germany (here 28%), but only at the cost of a collapse near future. Awards will expire soon, nobody will buy more. German industry expects a drop in sales of one million pieces per year neighbor Marchionne has already gone to knock on public money, threatening a "catastrophe" of layoffs. Member States have succumbed to the blackmail of the car lobby, and will pay the consequences. Them, us, and also the lobby, we hope.
In the U.S., in November, the expiring tax breaks for the purchase of new homes ($ 8,000 tax credit on) the sale of homes, which has already fallen by 70%, will fall again. In Spain, are about to expire unemployment benefits: the unemployed Spaniards will soon live with 100 euro per week. In Italy, the grant applications increased by 50% in one year and will last six months only.
Private consumption will shrink again, even in Italy where the industrial production decreased by 18%, in Germany less than 17%, 23% less in Japan. Bank credit to consumers and businesses is restricted as never before, why should private banks should lend to industries whose production falls in a market where consumption fall?
So there will be no recovery. There will be maybe some pseudo-recovery as they are invented new artificial stimuli. And what will China, with its one million tonnes of copper paid a high price that can not be used because exports do not resume, and industries do not need them? You may also begin to sell it. Getting the effect of a fall in price, so a another burst bubble. The economy is more global, the more unsettling. But our national pennivendoli listen Dragons ....
0 comments:
Post a Comment