Free Tv Using Megaviedo
September ... "Handbook of Youth Mignotte" hot off the press for a hot summer ... "Smignottare is just, moral, liberating, dutiful, intelligent, is the antidote to regret, funny, gorgeous ... use its weapons of seduction to get something done is not only wrong but it is good and right. A support (with lots of tips) and Debora Ferretti, author
All manuals are defined as having a purpose. What was yours? Helping women to make the flag of their femininity without hindrances or false moral ethics. We know very well that, handsome or not, women are able to get something with a blink of an eye, an overlap of legs, a nod and a glance. It is part of the dynamics between social laws of marketing. Yet we continue to farcene species. I've just put on paper. few simple rules in a nutshell ... something fundamental image: to be a whore does not mean necessarily appear so. The woman already tanned superaccessoriata in January is not necessarily the most available of Ms. very bon ton. Smignottare is good and right thing? I would say that this book is highly contextualized. In 2009, in Italy, is a fact that the moral fabric is very loose. The much criticized Naomi various tissues and are part of a circuit. What then is the same to which we belong. The costumes are certainly high, but reviewed and may not expect from them this renewal. This book is a guide (so is presented) for those who do not yet know that they are "sitting on a fortune," as the subtitle. But an acquittal on paper for those who have already taken advantage of what nature has given her a dowry. in British schools comes the 'propaganda of pleasure'
There's a thin line that separates sex education exhortation to sex. That imaginary line seems to have been totally overcome in England, where the National Health Service has issued a leaflet for schools entitled 'Pleasure', which contains within it the slogan, 'An orgasm a day keeps the doctor away'. The sentence contains the meaning of the new campaign of British Health System, which wants to communicate to young people who have sex, or obtaining of sexual pleasure, is good for health. 'Sexual intercourse trigger the body and facilitate the movement', as does physical activity in general. Very often intimidating propaganda-style 'anti-sexual', made to limit youth pregnancies and prevent the spread of venereal diseases has not had the desired effect, so the Health Service has changed its strategy. The hope of the creators of the campaign is to show the pros and cons of being sexually active, pushing the boys to a more conscious and responsible sexuality. However, the message was not well received by many of the parents and educators, as well as being shocked, they fear that from now on young people (and others) feel empowered to take a libertine lifestyle. Just can not leave
shocked. Why should it? In a society incapable of giving up anything, why should it surprise the unbridled incitement to pleasure? Moreover, the waiver involves a sacrifice that has in view the greater good .... But what is the greater good? Who knows? Certainly not the educators of today. The Fed threat ... Senator Ron Paul has collected 256 signatures to his petition - more than 55% of the House of Representatives because he was listening to the Federal Reserve (HR 1207). Thursday, 9 us, Donald Kohn, vice-chairman of the Federal Reserve, has threatened retaliation for raising interest rates if Congress continued to exhibit "examine some of the political decisions that affect more closely at some of the U.S. central bank, "as reported by Reuters. Kohn, and his boss Ben Bernanke, are obviously very concerned about the prospect that the American people can look in their accounts. Kohn, and his boss Ben Bernanke, are obviously very concerned about the prospect that the American people can look in their accounts. To quell the outrage of such a shameless grabbed power, Obama and its consultants, bankers, criminals have proposed that the Fed is flanked by a symbolic Board of Regulators. On June 16, Timothy Geithner - Operating Goldman Sachs - said: "When there are too many people involved, you have a problem of who is responsible." In other words, Congress and the American people need to mind their own business, the Federal Reserve is an institution owned by bankers and not the American people. "Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are institutions of the United States government," as Louis T. McFadden - Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Monetary - he put in the minutes of the Congress in 1932, during the "Great Depression." [But] are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey are the People of the United States for the benefit of their members and their international fraudsters. "
This also applies to the Bank of Italy. Major scientific adviser to Obama called for the forced population control ... Major science and technology adviser to President Obama, John Holdren, was co-author of a book in 1977 which called for the formation of a "planetary system" that used a "global police force" to impose totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortion, mass sterilization programs conducted with food and drinking water, and bodily systems also required that prevent couples from having children. The concepts outlined in the book of the 1977 Ecoscience Holdren, who has written with colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Erlich were so shocking that a history of FrontPage Magazine's February 2009 on this subject was considered unreliable because people could not believe it was true. It was only when another Internet blog has found the book and placed online images of the pages that the horrific truth of what really Holdren wrote began to be believed.
The argument is important because Holdren and his colleagues are now driving the efforts to combat "climate change" with programs focused on Intervention crazy as geo-engineering on the planet. Holdren recently called "geo engineering of large scale projects to cool the earth" as "shoot particles of pollution in the upper atmosphere to reflect the rays of the sun", which many say is already happening with chemtrails.
It is also important to stress that these are not the opinions of one man. As we have documented recently correspond to those pursued by many other important public figures in politics, academia and the environmental movement for decades.
Consider the fact that people as David Rockefeller, Ted Turner and Bill Gates, three men with close contacts with the eugenics movement, met recently with other billionaires "philanthropists" in New York to discuss "how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of world population "according to an article in the London Times.
Ted Turner has publicly called for programs to reduce the appalling population that would reduce the human race by a staggering 95%. He also advocated a policy of communist style of a child only imposed by Western governments. Of course, Turner is careful not to follow its own rules about how everyone else should live, having five children and having no less than two million acres of land. In the Third World
Turner offered literally billions to population reduction, especially through UN programs, clearing the way for others such as Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (the father of Gates has long been on the Board of Directors Planned Parenthood and a prominent eugenics).
The notion that these elites just want to reduce population growth to improve health is an absolute misunderstanding. Reduce the world population growth and improving health together two concepts are antithetical to the elite. The stabilization of world population is a natural result of higher living standards, as was evidenced by the stabilization of the white population in the West. People like David Rockefeller has no interest in "slow the growth of world population" using natural methods, their agenda is firmly based on pseudo-science of eugenics, which only affects the "selection" of excessive population with draconian methods.
The legacy of David Rockefeller is not derived from an anxiety of benevolent philanthropy for improving health in third world countries, comes from a Malthusian drive to eliminate the poor and those considered racially inferior, using the justification of Darwinism social.
As documented in the important movie Endgame by Alex Jones, the father of Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics to Germany from England, its place of origin, funding the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which later would have been the cornerstone of the ideology of the Third Reich of Nazi super race. After the fall of Nazism, major German eugenicists were protected by the allies, and the winners were fighting for their "experience" for the postwar world.
The justification for the adoption of draconian measures of population control is changed to suit the fashions and contemporary trends. What was once disguised as concern about global overpopulation is now returned in the guise of climate change and the movement of global warming. What has not changed is the fact that at its core, this is merely the arcane pseudo-science of eugenics, devised the first time by American and British elite in the late 19th century and later adopted by the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. The fact that the chief scientific adviser to the President of the United States, a man who holds the ranks of environmental policy, once it wished publicly mass sterilization of the American public by intervening in the food and water, along with a plethora of more disgusting Ecoscience is presented in a terrifying prospect that would not be out of place in a science fiction movie, and heavy accusation to the true source of what appears today as the environmental movement controlled by the elite from the top down.
only bringing to light the horrific plans for population control of Holdren we can warn people of the horrors that the elite have planned for us by controlling population, sterilization, and programs that have already started sorting genocide ...
Prison Planet are willing to buy more. Also wanted to, they can not: there is more savings to drain thousands of pensioners who lost everything in the collapse of finance, and Goldman cronies have dried up almost anything. Nobody in their right mind buys more spontaneously creative financing products.
Put yourself in the shoes of Goldman Sachs. What should be done to pull the boiled for four Payroll?
must create a "market" a new type of securities. A market in which the actors - in this case, businesses and families - are forced to participate, even if they do not want: required by law. Titles that you should necessarily buy.
Impossible? Instead, it is possible to Goldman Sachs, because controls the U.S. government and several other governments and central banks. In fact, this was discussed at the G-8: Here
created the 'market' ideal for Goldman Sachs. A "market" that will be required by law to participate. And a market that will see a continuous rise, and will never falls, because - if it passes the ventilated type of legislation from the White House - each year, by law, the limit at which businesses can pollute will be lowered. So this latest absurd 'securities, "those rights to pollute, will be increasingly scarce, and therefore more expensive. Obama himself has suggested that this "market" will auction 645 billion traded "Carbon credits" in the first seven years, some of his economic advisers have hinted that it could be three times bigger. What does Goldman Sachs
waiting for this market still is not there?
Goldman Sachs bought 10% of the Chicago Climate Exchange, the exchange system where the pollution credits (licenses real hot air) will be exchanged. What is a minority shareholder in Blue Source LLC, a company unknown, based in Utah, whose reason for existence is selling "pollution credits" that soon will become mandatory for many companies to buy. What was born as if by magic, with $ 500 million capital, a Growt Green Fund, an investment fund that will invest in companies 'green' and 'environmentally friendly', run by a former executive at Goldman Sachs named Ben Kortlang. That the new company ecology Al Gore, called Generation Investment Management - which will invest in greenhouse-gas credits - is led by David Blood, Max Ferguson and Peter Harris, three large pieces of Goldman Sachs. In addition, Goldman has done a lot 'of investments in companies involved in renewable energy.
Goldman, always panting for the good of humanity, created a special office against global warming, which has head Ken Newcombe, a character that already when he was at the top of the World Bank was concerned with how to extract money from the 'fight' greenhouse effect: he founded the Global Environment Facility and eight investment funds under the auspices of the World Bank (but actually private) trading in the securities of foul air coming next. Once elevated to the chair of Goldman Sachs, Newcombe has ruled that the sale of securities will not be enough carbon to reduce global pollution, and requires large investments and lucrative public subsidies to be given to private companies that research and develop sustainable energy. Meanwhile, Goldman has set an example by buying shares of Horizon Wind Energy (windmills hi-tech) in the BP Solar (photovoltaic panels), and a company called Changing World Technologies, which deals with obtaining oil from the pseudo-ecological and the oleaginous grain. All companies at a loss, until you reach the desired state subsidies by Newcombe.
But as Paulson said when he had his hat as chairman of Goldman Sachs, "we do not make these investments with the intention of losing money."
For Lobbying Senators and Members of Congress to combat the greenhouse effect, Goldman has spent $ 3.5 million in 2008 alone. Meanwhile, he placed one of his (former?) Employee named Gary Gensler, as president of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that the supervisory board should monitor the future market for securities-pollution. How to oversee the CFTC, has been seen in the recent speculation on the oil flame, passed suddenly last year at $ 143 a barrel and then dropped to 70.
When he was a body not controlled by Goldman Sachs, the CFTC, by law, placed severe limits to speculation in the markets for raw materials essentially required that buying and selling crude oil futures on grains or are the producers and users of real physical of these basic commodities, leaving only marginal scope for financial speculators, who could not deliver the goods, nor wanted to be real. Recently it was discovered that the CFTC has exempted from these limits in a single bank. What? You guessed it: a Goldman Sachs. And this exemption has been kept secret for 17 years.
no coincidence that between 2003 and 2008, the speculative money invested in commodities has increased from 13 billion to 317 billion dollars, an increase of 2300%. In 2008, a tanker loaded with crude oil was bought and sold 27 times on average before its content was actually delivered and consumed. It was in 2008 that Goldman, as he raises the barrel of oil at $ 143, "provide" that would rise to 200: and pension funds to buy you threw.
Now that oil is about 70 and the last crumbs of pensions were plundered with this trick, Goldman makes sure the domain on "market" compulsory licenses on carbon by placing a man at the head of his so-called control unit of pollution credits. It will be a fat business, a trillion dollars a year at least.
Europe is already prepared to take skin from this last trick, even with enthusiasm, as evidenced by the recent 'spontaneous' success in the elections of the European Green Party of the Jew-French-German Daniel Cohn-Bendit.
Ecologists in good faith would do well to ask why, to reduce emissions, we should just open a market for rights to pollute, as the Kyoto Protocol.
Would not it be more logical to impose a tax public on industrial pollution, which would drive the most polluting industries to reduce emissions to reduce their costs, and meanwhile to pay for environmental damage they produce? It would be more logical, simpler, and for the benefit of the State, recipient of the tax.
But no. As explained by Matt Taibbi in an extraordinary investigation into the misdeeds of Goldman Sachs appeared on "Rolling Stones," that "market" is designed on purpose to impose a tax on polluters yes, but a tax that is collected by private speculators. Wall Street is failing to convert another market commodity in a tax benefit of Wall Street as the only beneficiary.
's why Simon Linnett, Executive Vice President of Rothschild, advocated the creation of a supranational entity, which he called the World Environment Agency, to regulate the carbon tax and the sale of such rights.
pollution from greenhouse gases, said an official of the Rothschild, "is an international problem that requires an international solution. If governments do not give part of their sovereignty to a new supranational institution, the proposed trade of CO2 can not be implemented and regulated at a global level. "
How often have we heard the same arguments from Burxelles? By Padoa Schioppa? When he was Minister Prodi's (ex-Goldman Sachs), Padoa Schioppa is taken as Undersecretary Massimo Tononi, a guy who came from Goldman Sachs. In 2006, Padoa Schioppa entrusted to Goldman Sachs, rather than an Italian or European bank, the task of studying the future of the Cassa, and to place a 3 billion euro in the Italian public debt in global markets due 2016. No accident that the Italian rulers of so-called "left", when they lose public place driven by the voters, are the hot seat at Goldman Sachs. The conflict of interest exists only against Berlusconi. And then we wonder why people do not vote more "left". From
Dragons? Linnett continues
"I am convinced that it is essential that the states and the private sector work together to solve the problem. As a banker, I say (...) that only the private sector can successfully develop this solution, but only governments can provide the legislative framework for its implementation at international level. As a banker, I see with pleasure that the system of "cap-and-trade" (the buying and selling pollution rights, ed) is emerging as the dominant method for controlling the COO2. Unlike taxation or by a simple regulation, cap-and-trade offers more space for the private sector, the bearer of innovation. "
Linnett goes on: "Taxes and regulations can be imposed only at the national level, while the cap-and-trade may work at a global level, and remember, the problem is global. "
"How to convince the private sector to participate with enthusiasm in the world market for carbon gases?" Asks Mr. Rothschild. And he answers: "Governments must together establish a robust legal framework within which trade (licenses hot air) can take place.
This frame must be long, loud and legal '. How
Linnett Rothschild intends to "make clear to the peoples of the world" the seriousness of the project. He replied:
"When an individual receives the electricity bill, it must understand the cost to the environment exerts every time he turns on the lights or opens the gas valve. Gain a new awareness of the burden that imposes on the rest of the world. "
In short, the bill will increase, because the individual begins to develop a sense of guilt, to feel a polluter, an enemy of humanity. One who deserves the punishment inflicted by Rothschild and Goldman.
"Similarly," continues Linnett, "if the scheme will be extended geographically to include India, China and the U.S., such claims (the titles of pollution) will become the world's reserve currency, assuming the role of gold was '.
Yes, you understood: these people want to sell securities, which represent a certain amount of carbon dioxide, such as gold. Rothschild dreams as long as there is no more the dollar as the currency of world trade, but only the titles of hot air emitted by Rothschild and Goldman. And you have to buy, like it or not, because they will have - in their own way - legal tender. And did you buy them with the bill rising.
"In this way," concludes Linnett, "the trading of emissions can create a new world order for a sustainable planet ... Allocate this 'resource' in the fullest way and takes appropriate action taken and the spirit of global imagination. " That there is no shortage at Goldman & Rothschild.
It 's all decided. The financial needs of a new "market" to continue to take profits from the people who work: the new tax on working on the farm (with cows pollute flatulence) and on the breath, collected by Goldman & Rothschild.
"The Israeli Foreign Ministry has unveiled a new plan to pay people who posts answers on the pro-Israeli websites around the world. A total of 600 000 NIS (about $ 150,000) will be allocated to create a team" Internet war. "The ministry is seeking to recruit young people who speak at least one foreign language and studying communication, political science, law or Israelis with .... experience of military analysts of information "(Ynetnews, agency enraica, July 13).
I recently learned that while California is bankrupt, its employees and pays the bills with public expenditure (which banks do not want to accept), there are two U.S. states that do not suffer from the crisis: Montana and North Dakota. This is because those states have their own bank, which deposits the tax revenue. And using the method of fractional reserve is allowed to all other private banks (State why not?), these bonded warehouses are used as "reserves" to create loans 8:00 to 10:00 times the value of the reserves. So, are immune from the restrictions of the credit caused by Wall Street. Obviously, the citizens of Montana and North Dakota willingly put their savings into "their" bank. So can the state of California, or Italian. Who knows why he does not, and inject money into private banks.
What is happening in Afghanistan?
E 'an Italian soldier died in Afghanistan, 14 in all since we've sent there. Each year
5-6 thousand Italian youth (silly), often minors, die in car accidents from drugs, alcohol and stoned in the early hours of the decibels. So it's safer than going out on patrol in Afghanistan dancing, or driving on Saturday night.
But this does not deserve massacre continues the "official condolences of the Head of State 'or freezes the public that is moved by the grief of the mother of a soldier, and does not deserve a special service of TG to the country of the dead man in camouflage ... will not tolerate a death in the conflict, we do not tolerate three and four died on the job.
But the "dead on the Fun 'tolerate them. It seems that you can pay a price, because our young people "distract you," why are not limited in their impulses and desires, why do not you will be educated to a minimum sacrifice, but the pleasure ....
In the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed skin again, manifesting itself through the program's global tax on carbon and the idea that having too many children or enjoy a relatively high standard of living is to destroy the planet with global warming, creating the pretext for more regulations and controls every aspect of our lives. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment