G8
Play G =, 8 = infinity ...
Moral: There are infinite possibilities of being caught your ass!
Played 's 8 14 20 22, it is easier than to win the Lotto ... climate change thanks to the 8, not 15, maybe 20 large land!
"The health of our planet is at risk, you must act - Obama concludes - we have to shape our future and not let the events do it for us" .... Talk to him who is the head of a state already failed!
... contents to two degrees Celsius compared to the pre-industrial warming up the planet and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50% for all countries by 2050,
Big plus Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa are committed to "significantly increase" and to "coordinate government investment in research and development" of clean technology, "with the idea to double this investment by 2015." Renewed commitment
... also with regard to the UN Millennium Goals: the achievement of 0.56 percent of the relationship between official development assistance / Gross Domestic Product (ODA / GDP) by 2010 and 0.7 percent by 2015 . Other
numbers, 20 50, 15, 56, 10, 7.
... Aid that must arrive on time primarily to enable poor countries to enable "concrete measures" against the global financial crisis and ensuring access to credit for small farmers and entrepreneurs in the South.
We NO! We are okay, as poker "served." All this provides an 'inclusive approach' to globalization, the only one capable of achieving "concrete results" in the fight against poverty.
Here we are ridiculous, just think how many times I have said in the last 40 years ...
short, the moral cost us a "bang" is that we are all united to save the planet!
HOW? Here's how:
... take a multimillionaire like Mr. T. Boone Pickens is a "ticoon" of the energy sector, not of any DeBenedettiGnuttiColaninni and without a penny of their own, a great promoter of alternative energy - As everyone knows - reduce global warming.
We believe so much it has invested through his company Media Power, $ 2 billion to create the largest company of wind turbines in the world, "the Texas Panhandle." To this end, Pickens ordered 687 turbines from General Electric wind mill blades those that produce ultra-modern (as everyone knows) clean energy and natural. Pickens has willed the Giants, his turbines: 400 feet, as a building of 30 floors. To put in a vast area of \u200b\u200bTexas 100 000 hectares, which he rented specifically in order to obtain county Panhandle by 2014, as advertised, 4 000 megawatts, "enough to light a million homes. The business of the century.
just that - as explained in an interview - "when I started getting these turbines, I thought ... I say, there are in my garage, I put them somewhere else. "
Now Pickens is looking for countries and counties in other states willing to accept some of the 687 turbines of 120 meters has already ordered ...
Texas is so great that it can theoretically hold the entire world population, each family with its chalet. Yet even in the vast semi-desert and Texas, known as the environmental impact of the turbines does not go so well.
Above all, the genius of renewable energy has noticed (in order facts) that part of his problem is that there is a distribution network that brings electricity from its desolate County Panhandle to the famous million homes to be lit. Pickens says he decided to build its own distribution system, but that "there are technical problems." The
you may believe, and you can believe that the more technical problems and lack of capital for a new, massive spending.
So deleted the major project, and now seeks to participate in programs of less gigantic mills, where to place a bit 'of its wind turbines. Maybe Canada, maybe in the Midwest.
Pickens deserves to go down in history as a living refutation of the dogma of the primary liberalism: that the private public enterprise knows best how to invest its capital, because it leaves direct from the 'market' and its invisible hand, which is infallible.
Pickens is not stupid. He spent $ 60 million in advertising and meetings throughout the country "in an effort to make the State, and local governments to subsidize his project."
So Pickens is not as fearless champion of "private", but as the (for us!) Not unprecedented figure of the private with public money. For here is not the "market" that inspired the project, but the airship that capitalism, now in the terminal state, such as States. That is the inefficient production of energy, subsidized with public money.
Because this is the only certain thing that comes out of the G-8:
no clear rules and strict financial adventurers who have caused the global economic collapse, not a global response to the wave of unemployment that awaits us in the near future, but the 'obligation to increase the global share of renewable energy so-called "renewable, alternative or clean. Under the guise of reducing emissions.
In fact, the finance claimed that the State intervention in the economy now, but intervening in the direction desired by the end capitalism. That is "imposing" the new technologies of the future. The powers
strong link to the new business hours of renewable energy, for which you create a market force of terrorism on global warming and the end of oil. Another way to remain slaves of the banks ...
If there is a technological innovation that promises to compete with the great revolution passed electronics are actually nanotechnology, with all the risks relating to the use of materials in sub-particles microscopic able to overcome the barrier and cerebral blood.
But the powers that be have chosen the alternative energy ... solar and wind mills hi-tech.
to understand that these methods are inefficient, do not be a technician. Just see that they receive public subsidies: this means that the energy they produce costs several times more energy from oil, coal and nuclear.
cheap energy?! NO, is a high energy cost, so much so that to persuade Italy to produce it (the most generous country in Europe in this area) pays a subsidy of 36-49 cents per kilowatt hour. This "encourages many investors to come to us" with their machines and their boards, says the Courier, (June 26) and is easy to see why: there is a business for the German photovoltaic panels (highly inefficient) and the mills General Electric.
paid by a business State. U.S.. How much will it cost? To produce 1 GW
a gas turbine plant would cost 1 billion to 2 billion coal-fired, the three nuclear, wind 6 to 60 billion Photovoltaics. The joke is that even if you choose and commit itself to adopt a figure of between 6 and 60 billion (depending on the mix of wind and PV), that nuclear reactor should be the same, for when the sun does not shine or the wind does not blow. In short, the only function of wind farms or PV is to save fuel. Stated differently, the billions spent, all day, for a wind farm (6) or an equivalent system Fv (60) would save, in 30 years of generous financial year, half a billion nuclear fuel ... and I do not mind the controversy over whether the uranium is running out too, because you can make a nuclear reaction with other materials such as ... the reactors from Toshiba. Rather
: Please note that these powers have always been lacking funding for nuclear fusion technology, which aims to get clean energy, high and concentrated, and therefore useful to industrial development.
In general, any sensible solution to energy saving and low cost has been thwarted. Years ago, Fiat offered a co-generator technology, small home: a device the size of a gas boiler, which produced no hot water but only enough electricity for an apartment, thanks to a small car engine diesel. It was economically and ecologically, because such a device in every home spared the considerable loss of energy along the large power grids. The project was cleared by the large producers of electricity.
The ideological liberalism has always been opposed to subsidies that artificially lower the price of a commodity or service, is hostile to the train or tram ticket that does not cover costs, is to subsidize an industry contrarissimo European aeronautics, or any other industry. And 'the' market ', proclaims that determine which products should agree, with free competition, etcetera, etcetera.
Strangely, liberalism is an exception in one case: for alternative energy sources, requires subsidies.
Li claims. Why?
Why is global warming, baby, say these philanthropists, and as the global warming kills polar bears is caused by man (sure, sure), it should require the economies of all countries to "cut emissions. " We should say that the economic crisis produced by the finance is already offering a sad solution: a production declined by 35% (a decline not seen since 1930), the terrible emissions will be reduced also, thousands of chimneys and so will remain off of friends' environment. w the crisis.
's all already decided, as he wrote to the Telegraph: "They announced detailed plans to expand renewable energy by ten times and cut emissions of greenhouse gases that warm the planet in less than a decade. "
England (practically already failed!) Gets only 1, 5% of its so-called renewable energy sources, wind and sun. But proactive, interventionist, obedient as always to the lords of finance, seeks to bring to 30% by 2020, mainly with windmills in Scotland.
The state most hostile to interventionism with regard to 'financial markets, "he wants free and wild in this area already has a plan just like the Soviet five-year plans in recent memory ....
Lord Mandelson, Secretary Economic Affairs, will launch a "Low Carbon Industrial Strategy" with which the government will create 400 000 new jobs in environmental industries within eight years and will transform the entire economy completely changing our industrial landscape, and way in which we work and consume. "
In England 400 000 new jobs, please believe it, are mere propaganda. You should know how many jobs will be destroyed by the heavy environmental regulations (which will throw hundreds of companies out of business, industrial and agricultural), and if the hypothetical 400 000 will be enough to offset the jobs lost by sta 'sustainable'.
In Spain, before the economy class 'green', for every job created by this sector are missing in the other 2.2! A real bargain. So the airship
London practice - an economic policy choice by the State and not by the market - for the economy 'green'. The revolution will be economic and energy required by law.
"The publication of the plan, says the Telegraph," will be followed by an Energy Law, which will be included in the next Queen's speech, to promote the technology to remove carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants, new power stations are prohibited if they did not take. "
They will "promote" a technology, inefficient and ineffective for now.
The difference with the old fascist interventionism (horrors!) is all here: the one, identify points of excellence in the country, and promoted and protected (with tariffs and subsidies) for purposes of self-reliance and progress. They do so for another purpose. And give subsidies.
"The strategy includes plans for subsidies, through which households and businesses that install renewable energy installations will be able to sell excess energy they produce on favorable terms, a measure that has spurred the rapid growth of solar energy in Germany» , writes the Telegraph enthusiastic.
not to say / do not think about when writing / no know what he says, because, your benefits will be paid by taxpayers, who suffer twice: pay less than more expensive energy, and will lose many economic activities employing ....
The plan is an austerity program imposed globally. with us, a land of poets, it also says "It decreases HAPPY"
E 'in place clearly a superior will, drawn up in the clubs open (Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations) to which governments are obeying. And the fact that you obey the British state - the first ride in the worst financial creativity, which draws 8% of GDP by the activities of the City - that among the many faults have to use polluting smokestacks - should prompt suspicion.
This is apparently so contrary to the tenets of market liberalism of Adam Smith, to make an urgent question: why do they do?
Ben 31 000 scientists have signed a document (reproduced below), in which contend that "there is no convincing evidence" that climate change is produced by human activity.
There is an emerging scientific consensus that climate change depends largely on the water vapor (a greenhouse gas far more effective than carbon dioxide, and produced by the oceans) and phenomena cosmic as the activity of the Sun (sunspots are back to be alive after years).
Since 2006, global temperature has dropped even of 0.39 degrees C (http://www.climatedepot.com/a/1799/Global-temperatures-have-plunged-74degF-since-Gore-released -An-Inconvenient-Truth).
They make discoveries that can really produce energy efficiently, such as this that simulates the ability of chlorophyll to convert sunlight into energy (http://refreshingnews9.blogspot.com/2009/06/first-step-towards-converting -solar.html).
But this kind of research findings and does not apply. Some claim that the world economy is completely changed make it fit - by dint of subsidies - to produce renewable energy.
And in this effort, they claim that some industries are 'helped' and other (perhaps more promising or simple) no. Yes
to photovoltaics and LEDs, is not a mature technology solutions to all existing and readily adoptable.
In the midst of an apocalyptic crisis, take measures which are in themselves of depression, as it aggravates the cost of production. Why?
Perhaps the answer can be found in works by Robert Heilbroner (1919-2005): a billionaire philosopher for whom nobody has ever bothered to introduce us.
A true insider, an inspiration for those clubs where you take the high decisions. Jew-rich family of German Heilbroner headed for the U.S. war in the Office of the Comptroller of prices, one of the most powerful military power reserved of the airship, then became a banker, but found his arrival at the New School for Social Research: a very secluded private university, which since 1933 is located in the luxurious Greenwich Village, lavishly funded by the Rockefeller and Hiram Halle (another oil billionaire jew), whose chairman is Senator and presidential candidate Bob Kerry.Che What does the New School of Social Reserach?
essence, is the secret stronghold of the old "critical Marxism" of the Frankfurt School (Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse) combining with American pragmatism (Dewey), and strives to adapt to changing economic conditions. It 'so to speak the wing "left" of the World Jewish-American, what he preached in the years 50-70 and imposed the "planning" of the Western economies, a position held by the Republicans in Italy by Giorgio La Malfa. And so promising in the Soviet Union ... is not it?
The New School has hosted during the war and given a professorship at the Jacques Maritain and Claude Levi-Strauss, who introduced in the U.S. thought 'alternative' French Foucault, and Deleuze Deerrida.
Significantly, in order to influence the moods of the masses with specific suggestions collective induced by the cinema, this strange university has created a "laboratory of dramaturgy" (Dramatic Workshop), Erwin Piscator directed German Jew, who has trained famous actors such as Marlon Brando, Ben Gazzara, Tony Curtis, and writers like Tennessee Williams. ... Interesting or not?
Heilbroner himself as the most important "philosopher of the here," and supported the economy of the Soviet centralized plan .... The focus was for him the most direct path to global government, capitalism, however, dispersing the decision-making and abandoning them to the spontaneity of millions of individuals, was less effective in order. ... That bad luck! Of course
that this "thought" has known an eclipse in the two decades of the crowds wild liberalism, dominated by the Chicago School of economics with Milton Friedman. Heilbroner himself admitted in an important article published in The New Yorker September 10, 1990, entitled "Reflections after Communism."
Admittedly, he wrote, that "capitalism organizes the material affairs of humankind better than socialism." But there's still hope: capitalism (as Marx says) always leads to monopolies, and therefore new socialism. Enough to withstand and operate in the shadows to accelerate this outcome.
How? We
global-socialist survivors, said Heilbroner, we have to hide behind the environmental movement, promote and enhance.
Environmentalism is the form in which the Socialists can still be heard by politicians and public opinion. And is the best way to force the central planning economy to a global level. Here is a summary of the article:
"... Socialism is unlikely to be an important force for change, now that communism is over. But another way of looking to socialism is (look) to the society that must emerge if humanity has to face the ecological burden that economic growth poses to the environment. From this perspective, a look at long post-communist aims beyond capitalism, to an unexplored world that will take shape and solidify before receiving a name, "
this did not happen in these years?
Kyoto protocols are the result of this "new" ideology, before you even have a name, has been imposed globally. The G-8, with its proposal to reduce emissions of an absurd 50-80% by 2050, which does not obey the directions of Heilbroner and his "long look".
starts a new experiment in social engineering, led by the austerity and decrease the financial system: the "left" of Heilbroner. The aim is always the same:
world government under the planned economy bankers. Those who have sown destruction but inexplicably saved ... (Who voted for this rescue? Where is written that banks produce wealth and should be saved? "The constitution gives us what?)
However, Mr. Pickens does not know where to put his 687 windmills, after all, is not a fool. He just acted so precipitately. Will have to wait a while 'before they begin to rain down upon him the benefits. But
come.
Already the media applaud the G-8; Already the environmentalists screaming that is not enough, you have to cut more, close more factories, shut down most chimneys.
But these "our" politicians, newspaper, Eco fuel, Verdi, Rainbows, families with kids running around the neck in a stable, ongoing, all-Straight direct look short, or someone is paid? Sure is that I'm the only fool who is not paid!
COLOR NOTE: Obama's daughters around Rome had a shirt with the "No War"
... There are some symbols which use inflated surrounds our lives, often unconsciously, and have the hope of a power auspicious, beneficial and protective ... some are borrowed from pagan symbols, and this already says as being still in us certain beliefs does not raise much, despite 2000 years of history!
Who would oppose the equal Christians do use their signs, the answer to the basic mental attitude is completely different, the Christian believes and hopes in the symbol, pointing out the marvels wrought by love, the God person and worked for him by rescuing those who relies on the heart, without invoking the give anything for granted nor can claim anything it should be: the free gift dominates his consciousness, the loving protection of the Father descended from this consciousness. Instead, the user of the talisman on duty would get a benefit, embezzle it, without giving anything in return (not necessarily to convert, without a relationship of love with the donor), carrying with them or simply displaying the symbol and the fact math. On closer inspection, however, also pay slips, and handsomely, his debt: his superstition enslaves and fragile at the same time. Can not live without that sign of good wishes and thanks to the mercy seat which he hopes will get what. It is not the same for those who "scratch" away the symbols of luck to get money in return ?....
And the famous "peace flag"? flag whose use by "poor" priests was also the subject of the news. A curious observation is that which points out that the colors of the rainbow (the inflated use by the community U.S. is well known homosexuals) are reversed (homosexual) than the natural order. The choice of inversion, in the esoteric field, has a very specific symbolism. Moreover aping God, promising the equivalent (but in fact achieved the opposite) is a typical work of the devil. The rainbow is a symbol of biblical indicate the alliance between man and God, after purification, triggered by the deluge, is a sign of divine mercy bends on human misery. If so, then peace is only mocked: what you really want is the disharmony and discord invoked as a result of a plurality Babel and not really communicative. The origins the flag of peace to be found in theosophical theories born in the late 800. Theosophy (literally "knowledge of God") is that system of thinking that tends to intuitive knowledge of the divine. " Always present in Indian culture, has taken its modern version by the Theosophical Society, "a mystical movement, esoteric, spiritual and gnostic founded in 1875 by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky." The thought of the current represented by the rainbow flag is based on "Gnosticism", the "reincarnation and transmigration of the soul, the existence of" secret masters "and back to the New Age mentality that preaches absolute freedom and relativism, the idea of \u200b\u200b'divine man', rejecting the notion of sin ... the flag represents a nation, an idea, and this one in particular tells us that "it is possible to equate political parties or cultural groups that claim to legitimately defend the dignity of women, and groups, as has happened recently in Europe, claiming that the decriminalization of crimes of pedophilia. It is obviously possible aberrations, only within a relativistic mindset like that which characterizes our Western societies. "
No less pernicious is the use of so-called symbol peace.
It is said that it represents the combination of two graphics letters N and D for Nuclear Disarmament (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND)), as represented by the code signal flags with [the circle shows the word "global", color black represents eternity. In truth, you may notice an amazing coincidence (we believe it is a coincidence?) With the representation of the so-called-toten rune (used among others by the Nazi regime to identify the date of death, while the Algiz,, solar symbol , that of birth) - (Yr) "rune of death": If the
Algiz represents prosperity, protection, good luck, the second one is placed at opposite: it is a kind of invocation of the infernal forces, full vulnerability (the rest is intuitive even notice the simple fact of the arms pointing downward. The Circle: a traditional symbol of what has no beginning or end, formed by a single line whose ends rejoin to cancel one another. It leads to a separate limit defined between the inner surface and outer endless. The black can represent eternity only for those damages, the black loss of any color, no color.
In Christianity, eternity is well represented by gold, which is imperishable and incorruptible light, vital. Is not it strange that the Illuminati bankers have convinced us to move from a system based on money exchange in gold, to a system based on the print of one card ... If I do not believe the effectiveness, I believe that it serves "to influence the states of 'mind of the masses with special mass suggestion "and then to level the sensitivity and" convert "even those renittenti cristianucci that still persist in believing that there is a greater good ... the face of these four political shit and their owners, the Illuminati bankers .
0 comments:
Post a Comment